Qualification Rubric Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

719 ms typical, 769 ms slowest 5%

Last check

3 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/qualification_rubric/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Define transparent qualification criteria, weights, unknown handling, and evidence requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional account research supplied by the buyer: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew. The operations manager wants to improve consultation scheduling. A discovery meeting will discuss missed appointments and implementation effort. The prospect has not disclosed budget or a purchase date. The proposed offer is a scheduling-process assessment; no promised savings or implementation features are supplied."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fqualification_rubric%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/qualification_rubric/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Define transparent qualification criteria, weights, unknown handling, and evidence requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional account research supplied by the buyer: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew. The operations manager wants to improve consultation scheduling. A discovery meeting will discuss missed appointments and implementation effort. The prospect has not disclosed budget or a purchase date. The proposed offer is a scheduling-process assessment; no promised savings or implementation features are supplied."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Define transparent qualification criteria, weights, unknown handling, and evidence requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional account research supplied by the buyer: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew. The operations manager wants to improve consultation scheduling. A discovery meeting will discuss missed appointments and implementation effort. The prospect has not disclosed budget or a purchase date. The proposed offer is a scheduling-process assessment; no promised savings or implementation features are supplied."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Qualification Criteria for Scheduling-Process Assessment Offer\n\n### 1. Criteria Definition\n- **Appointment Reliability**: Frequency of missed appointments in current scheduling.\n- **Crew Size and Scheduling Complexity**: Number of personnel per installation and scheduling constraints.\n- **Operational Impact**: Degree to which missed appointments affect overall operations.\n- **Prospect Engagement**: Willingness to participate in discovery meeting.\n\n### 2. Weights\n| Criterion                | W",
  "assumptions": [
    "The two-person crew size is fixed and relevant to scheduling complexity.",
    "Missed appointments are a key operational pain point."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Quantitative data on missed appointment frequency.",
    "Details on scheduling constraints beyond crew size."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:39:58.561Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_qualification_rubric",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "The draft defines transparent qualification criteria for a scheduling-process assessment offer targeting a residential door installation company. It assigns weights to appointment reliability, crew si",
  "task": "qualification_rubric"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks