Risk Register Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

765 ms typical, 1.0 s slowest 5%

Last check

3 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/risk_register/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Identify risks grounded in the supplied project brief, with likelihood rationale, impact, mitigations, and owners. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Frisk_register%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/risk_register/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Identify risks grounded in the supplied project brief, with likelihood rationale, impact, mitigations, and owners. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Identify risks grounded in the supplied project brief, with likelihood rationale, impact, mitigations, and owners. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Risk Identification for Door Installation Scheduling Improvement Project\n\n### 1. Incomplete Data on Current Operations\n- **Likelihood:** High\n  - Rationale: The brief explicitly states that current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references, and measured outcomes are unknown.\n- **Impact:** High\n  - Without baseline data, assessing improvement impact and vendor effectiveness is difficult, risking poor decision-making.\n- **Mitigations:**\n  - Collect baseline data on booking volume, cu",
  "assumptions": [
    "Vendor proposals are final and no further negotiation is planned.",
    "The project timeline is fixed at six weeks."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume and scheduling data.",
    "Customer feedback on current scheduling and service."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:48.915Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_risk_register",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "Key risks include lack of baseline operational data, unclear vendor scope, limited staff training, scheduling constraints, and budget uncertainties. Mitigations focus on data collection, scope clarifi",
  "task": "risk_register"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks