Scan
by tokenctl.io in Onchain & crypto
Risk scan for one Solana SPL token. Call it before buying, listing, accepting or recommending a token you have not vetted. Checks mint and freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity and wash volume; pro also traces holder wallets for bot farms, shared funders and launch snipers. Returns NO_FLAGS, WATCH or RISKY with an AI summary. basic $0.02, pro $0.05. Scans that fail or have bad input are not charged.
https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 341 ms
- 1.2 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 1 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Solana, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan?mint=TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111&tier=basicParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
mint | string | Yes | Solana SPL token mint address (base58) |
tier | string | No | basic ($0.02): authorities, concentration, liquidity, holder spread, rule + AI verdict. pro ($0.05): basic + full wallet-behavior analysis. One of: basic, pro. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 56 lines
{
"ai": {
"escalatedBy": [],
"findings": [],
"headline": "Thin liquidity; no coordination seen across holders",
"verdict": "WATCH",
"watch": "Liquidity depth."
},
"authorities": {
"freezeAuthority": null,
"mintAuthority": null
},
"concentration": {
"available": true,
"excludesPools": true,
"partial": false,
"top10Percent": 18.4,
"top1Percent": 3.1,
"totalHolders": 5000
},
"dataAsOf": "2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"generatedAt": "2026-10-04T00:00:05.000Z",
"holderSpread": {
"holders": 5000,
"identicalGroups": [],
"identicalPct": 0,
"identicalWallets": 0,
"longTail": {
"dustHolders": 1200,
"medianHolderPct": 0.0012,
"rank201plusPct": 44.7,
"rank21to200Pct": 30.2,
"top20Pct": 25.1
}
},
"liquidity": {
"liquidityUsd": 12000,
"primaryPairLiquidityUsd": 12000,
"volume24hUsd": 15000,
"volumeToLiquidity": 1.6
},
"mint": "TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111",
"ruleReason": "thin liquidity ($12,000)",
"ruleVerdict": "WATCH",
"tier": "basic",
"token": {
"decimals": 6,
"marketCapUsd": 100000,
"name": "Example",
"priceUsd": 0.0001,
"program": "spl-token",
"supply": "1,000,000,000",
"symbol": "EX"
},
"verdict": "WATCH"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan?mint=TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111&tier=basic'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan?mint=TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111&tier=basic' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/svm @solana/kit @scure/base
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactSvmScheme } from "@x402/svm/exact/client";
import { createKeyPairSignerFromBytes } from "@solana/kit";
import { base58 } from "@scure/base";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactSvmScheme(client, { signer: await createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(base58.decode(process.env.SVM_PRIVATE_KEY)) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tokenctl.io%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fscan
const res = await pay("https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan?mint=TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111&tier=basic");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,svm]"
import os
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.svm import KeypairSigner
from x402.mechanisms.svm.exact.register import register_exact_svm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_svm_client(client, KeypairSigner.from_base58(os.environ["SVM_PRIVATE_KEY"]))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://www.tokenctl.io/api/v1/scan?mint=TokenMint1111111111111111111111111111111111&tier=basic")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h ago | Passed | 402 | 304 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.02 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 256 ms | $0.02 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 257 ms | $0.02 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 240 ms | $0.02 |
Show 10 older checks
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 307 ms | $0.02 |
| 32 h ago | Passed | 402 | 298 ms | $0.02 |
| 36 h ago | Passed | 402 | 251 ms | $0.02 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.0 s | $0.02 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 282 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 310 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.9 s | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 326 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.02 |