Screen
by presign-guard in Onchain & crypto
Is this wallet sanctioned? Screens any chain's address (EVM, Solana, Tron, Bitcoin, XRP Ledger, Algorand) against the OFAC SDN list, synced from the US Treasury, plus theft, phishing and mixer reports for EVM addresses. Green/orange/red with the SDN entry (name, programs) when listed. For sellers screening who pays them and agents checking who they pay. Bulk: 100 checks for $0.80 via /v1/credits.
https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 0.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- -
- no timed checks yet
- Last check
- Failed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 2 h ago: Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen?address=TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | Yes | The wallet address to screen, any chain: EVM (0x...), Solana, Tron, Bitcoin, XRP Ledger, Algorand, or another currency OFAC lists. The format tells the chain. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 56 lines
{
"address": {
"address": "TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81",
"format": "tron"
},
"grade": "AVOID",
"one_liner": "AVOID: on the OFAC SDN list (BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN)",
"reasons": [
{
"code": "SANCTIONED_ADDRESS",
"details": {
"list": "OFAC SDN",
"matches": [
{
"currency": "TRX",
"name": "BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN",
"programs": [
"IRAN",
"IFSR",
"IRGC",
"SDGT"
],
"type": "Entity",
"uid": 4632
}
],
"published": "2026-10-09"
},
"severity": "red"
}
],
"sanctions": {
"list": "OFAC SDN",
"listed": true,
"matches": [
{
"currency": "TRX",
"name": "BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN",
"programs": [
"IRAN",
"IFSR",
"IRGC",
"SDGT"
],
"type": "Entity",
"uid": 4632
}
],
"published": "2026-10-09",
"source": "ofac-sdn"
},
"sources": [
"ofac-sdn"
],
"verdict": "red"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen?address=TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen?address=TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpresign-guard.fizzl.eu%2Fv1%2Fscreen
const res = await pay("https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen?address=TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/screen?address=TNiq9AXBp9EjUqhDhrwrfvAA8U3GUQZH81")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 1.2 s | $0.01 |
| 5 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 980 ms | $0.01 |
| 11 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 241 ms | $0.01 |
| 16 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 423 ms | $0.01 |
| 22 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 485 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 28 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 278 ms | $0.01 |
| 34 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 313 ms | $0.01 |
| 39 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 328 ms | $0.01 |
| 45 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 268 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 291 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 431 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 275 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 299 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 341 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 263 ms | $0.01 |