Screen
by Wallet Sanctions & Risk Screen in Security & trust
Is this address safe to pay? Screen a wallet address before you pay or send funds to it: an OFAC SDN sanctions check of the address plus address reputation (drainer, phishing, mixer, money laundering) for EVM and Solana. Returns one verdict to branch on (allow, review, or block) with a 0-100 risk score and per-signal evidence. AML / KYT counterparty check for x402 payments. $0.02 USDC.
POST https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen
Last 30 days
Status and outage history · Atom feed
- Uptime
- 95.2%
- Response time
- 591 ms typical, 719 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- 2 h ago
- Next check
- any minute now
How to call it
POST https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen
content-type: application/json
{
"wallet": "0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96"
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
wallet | string | Yes | Wallet address — EVM 0x… (40 hex) or Solana base58 pubkey. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 39 lines
{
"address_type": "eoa",
"chain_inferred": "ethereum",
"checked_at": 1790985600,
"corpus_version": "ofac-sdn-2026-10-02",
"labels": [],
"notes": "Address is on the OFAC SDN list as LAZARUS GROUP (program DPRK3). DO NOT transact without a regulatory-approved exception.",
"partial": false,
"recommendation": "block",
"risk_level": "critical",
"risk_score": 100,
"sanctioned_lists": [
"OFAC SDN",
"LAZARUS GROUP",
"DPRK3"
],
"sanctions_match": true,
"signals": [
{
"code": "ofac_sdn",
"detail": "OFAC SDN, LAZARUS GROUP, DPRK3",
"severity": "critical",
"source": "treasury.gov"
},
{
"code": "sanctioned",
"detail": "On a sanctions list",
"severity": "critical",
"source": "goplus"
},
{
"code": "stealing_attack",
"detail": "Linked to token-stealing attacks",
"severity": "critical",
"source": "goplus"
}
],
"wallet": "0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"wallet":"0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96"}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"wallet":"0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96"}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.anchor-x402.com%2Fv1%2Fscreen&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"wallet": "0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96"
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/screen",
json={
"wallet": "0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96",
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
- No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 700 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 h ago | Passed | 402 | 544 ms | $0.02 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 641 ms | $0.02 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 556 ms | $0.02 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 594 ms | $0.02 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 569 ms | $0.02 |
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 681 ms | $0.02 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 672 ms | $0.02 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 580 ms | $0.02 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 719 ms | $0.02 |
| 40 h ago | Passed | 402 | 636 ms | $0.02 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 713 ms | $0.02 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 291 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 539 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 591 ms | $0.02 |