13trust / 100

Security

by CryptoPulse in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIFailing, checked 2 h ago

Token risk & honeypot scanner — detect honeypot contracts, rugpull, mint/tax traps and malicious or sanctioned wallet addresses on-chain via GoPlus (ETH/BSC/Base/Polygon/Arbitrum). Plus self-custody, seed and multisig setup guidance. For pre-trade safety and crypto security agents.

GET
https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security
Price
$0.1
per call in USDC
Uptime
0.0%
last 30 days
Response time
-
no timed checks yet
Last check
Failed
2 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Latest check failed 2 h ago: Amount "0.1" is not in atomic token units

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security

Each call costs $0.1 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
addressstringNooptional wallet address to screen (sanctions/phishing/mixer)
chainstringNoethereum | bsc | base | polygon | arbitrum | optimism | avalanche
setupstringNoexchange-only | software-wallet | hardware-wallet | multisig | institutional
tokenstringNooptional contract address to risk-scan (honeypot/tax/mint)
value_tierstringNounder1k | 1k-10k | 10k-100k | over100k

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "primary": "Ledger Flex ($249) or Trezor Safe 5 ($169)",
  "recommended_setup": "hardware-wallet",
  "red_flags": [
    "Storing seed phrase in cloud",
    "Using exchange as long-term storage"
  ],
  "seed_phrase": "Store on steel plate — never digital"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.1.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.1 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.1" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.1 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com%2Fapi%2Fsecurity
const res = await pay("https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.1 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.1"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://cryptopulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/security")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
2 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402285 ms$0.1
5 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402242 ms$0.1
10 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402191 ms$0.1
16 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402191 ms$0.1
21 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402210 ms$0.1
Show 9 older checks
27 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402202 ms$0.1
33 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402148 ms$0.1
39 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402217 ms$0.1
44 h agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402251 ms$0.1
2 days agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402161 ms$0.1
2 days agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units4021.8 s$0.1
3 days agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402164 ms$0.1
3 days agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402179 ms$0.1
3 days agoAmount "0.1" is not in atomic token units402163 ms$0.1