Sentiment
by Market & Brand Sentiment in Markets & finance
Market & brand sentiment for any keyword, brand, ticker or product: analyses the sentiment of web & news content mentioning it and returns an overall label (positive/negative/neutral/mixed), a net sentiment score (-1..1), positive/negative/neutral shares and an emotion breakdown (anger, happiness, love, sadness, fun).
https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment- Price
- $0.04
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 96.9%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 583 ms
- 660 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment
Each call costs $0.04 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment
content-type: application/json
{
"keyword": "example"
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
keyword | string | Yes | Brand, ticker, product or topic to gauge sentiment for, e.g. "tesla", "bitcoin", "nvidia rtx". |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"emotions": {
"anger": 10368,
"fun": 275760,
"happiness": 915120,
"love": 63928,
"sadness": 19120
},
"found": true,
"keyword": "tesla",
"label": "mixed",
"netSentiment": -0.001,
"polarity": {
"negative": 3986968,
"neutral": 3976184,
"positive": 3977904
},
"polarityShare": {
"negative": 33.39,
"neutral": 33.3,
"positive": 33.31
},
"source": "dataforseo",
"totalMentions": 11941056
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.04.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"keyword":"example"}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"keyword":"example"}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.04 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.04" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.04 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsentiment.openverbs.com%2Fv1%2Fsentiment&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"keyword": "example"
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.04 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.04"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://sentiment.openverbs.com/v1/sentiment",
json={
"keyword": "example",
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 583 ms | $0.04 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 599 ms | $0.04 |
| 11 h ago | Passed | 402 | 592 ms | $0.04 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 562 ms | $0.04 |
| 20 h ago | Passed | 402 | 565 ms | $0.04 |
Show 10 older checks
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 573 ms | $0.04 |
| 29 h ago | Passed | 402 | 611 ms | $0.04 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 586 ms | $0.04 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 561 ms | $0.04 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 583 ms | $0.04 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 578 ms | $0.04 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 608 ms | $0.04 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 573 ms | $0.04 |
| 2 days ago | Timed out | - | - | - |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 593 ms | $0.04 |