Services Wallet Risk Snapshot
by api.sys84.org in Onchain & crypto
Base wallet screening with provider coverage, address-security flags and account nonce. Contracts require separate assessment. Risk scores are heuristic, not calibrated safety probabilities.
https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 93.8%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 759 ms
- 1.0 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot
content-type: application/json
{
"address": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"chain": "base",
"refresh": true
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | No | string EVM wallet address to score |
chain | string | No | string optional, only base is supported |
refresh | boolean | No | boolean optional, all calls currently read fresh upstream data |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 37 lines
{
"chain": "base",
"quality": {
"confidence": 1,
"data_age_seconds": 0,
"degraded": false,
"partial": false,
"provider_status": {
"address_security": "available",
"token_balances": "available",
"tx_count": "available"
},
"unavailable_sources": []
},
"reasons": [
"no_onchain_history"
],
"refresh": true,
"risk_level": "low",
"risk_score": 30,
"service": "wallet_risk_snapshot",
"signals": {
"info_flags": [],
"is_safe": true,
"token_positions": 0,
"tx_count": 0,
"wallet_type": "eoa",
"whale_tier": "🐟 Retail"
},
"sources": {
"risk_model": "sys84_wallet_risk_snapshot_v1",
"wallet_intel": "alchemy_token_balances + base_tx_count + goplus_address_security"
},
"ts": 1785806733,
"verdict": "allow_with_limits",
"wallet": "0x64e4e6c18849ba687A468dcad0A582AC6f8089E4"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"address":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","chain":"base","refresh":true}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"address":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","chain":"base","refresh":true}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.sys84.org%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fwallet_risk_snapshot&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"address": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"chain": "base",
"refresh": true
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://api.sys84.org/v1/services/wallet_risk_snapshot",
json={
"address": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"chain": "base",
"refresh": True,
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 974 ms | $0.01 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 731 ms | $0.01 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 971 ms | $0.01 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 782 ms | $0.01 |
| 23 h ago | Passed | 402 | 738 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 750 ms | $0.01 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 750 ms | $0.01 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 758 ms | $0.01 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 740 ms | $0.01 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 992 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 972 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 728 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 753 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Connection failed (UND_ERR_CONNECT_TIMEOUT) | - | - | - |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 753 ms | $0.01 |