78trust / 100

Settlement Receipts Unit Label Consistency

by mahastrategies.com in Markets & finance

x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago

Compare receipt asset/network/decimal labels with caller-provided denomination contracts. No token-registry lookup, exchange rate, decimal normalization or financial accounting verdict. Offline typed nonpersonal metadata only. Result retention: 24 hours; minimal receipt metadata: 90 days.

POST
https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency
Price
$0.012
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
207 ms
427 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
4 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency

Each call costs $0.012301 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency
content-type: application/json

{
  "assets": [
    {
      "assetRef": "native-usdc",
      "decimals": 6,
      "id": "a1",
      "network": "eip155:8453"
    }
  ],
  "dataClass": "synthetic",
  "nonpersonalMetadata": true,
  "receipts": [
    {
      "amountUnits": "10000",
      "assetContractId": "a1",
      "assetRef": "native-usdc",
      "decimals": 6,
      "id": "r1",
      "network": "eip155:8453"
    }
  ]
}

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
assetsarrayYes
dataClassstringYes One of: public, synthetic.
nonpersonalMetadatabooleanYes
receiptsarrayYes

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 29 lines
{
  "data": {
    "chargedAmount": "12301",
    "inputHash": "sha256:8042e32df3a69b2777811543665ecadf156851cf389eb48d7cf8a9e24…",
    "limitations": [
      "Public or synthetic nonpersonal metadata only; these are caller …"
    ],
    "productId": "settlement-receipts-unit-label-consistency",
    "result": {
      "authoritativeSourcesConsulted": false,
      "domainValidationEstablished": false,
      "findings": [],
      "method": "settlement-receipts-unit-label-consistency/1",
      "metrics": [
        {
          "key": "matched-receipt-unit-frames",
          "recordId": "receipt",
          "value": "1"
        }
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:b80d603b8581bcbcaf3105360a2b47c1b349878572cfdf9c238585ef1…",
    "version": "maha-typed-metadata-audit/1"
  },
  "proof": {
    "settlement_id": "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000…"
  },
  "success": true
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.012301.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"assets":[{"assetRef":"native-usdc","decimals":6,"id":"a1","network":"eip155:8453"}],"dataClass":"synthetic","nonpersonalMetadata":true,"receipts":[{"amountUnits":"10000","assetContractId":"a1","assetRef":"native-usdc","decimals":6,"id":"r1","network":"eip155:8453"}]}'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"assets":[{"assetRef":"native-usdc","decimals":6,"id":"a1","network":"eip155:8453"}],"dataClass":"synthetic","nonpersonalMetadata":true,"receipts":[{"amountUnits":"10000","assetContractId":"a1","assetRef":"native-usdc","decimals":6,"id":"r1","network":"eip155:8453"}]}' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.012301 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.012301" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.012301 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mahastrategies.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fverify%2Fsettlement-receipts%2Funit-label-consistency&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    "assets": [
      {
        "assetRef": "native-usdc",
        "decimals": 6,
        "id": "a1",
        "network": "eip155:8453"
      }
    ],
    "dataClass": "synthetic",
    "nonpersonalMetadata": true,
    "receipts": [
      {
        "amountUnits": "10000",
        "assetContractId": "a1",
        "assetRef": "native-usdc",
        "decimals": 6,
        "id": "r1",
        "network": "eip155:8453"
      }
    ]
  }),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.012301 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.012301"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.post(
        "https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/verify/settlement-receipts/unit-label-consistency",
        json={
            "assets": [
                {
                    "assetRef": "native-usdc",
                    "decimals": 6,
                    "id": "a1",
                    "network": "eip155:8453",
                },
            ],
            "dataClass": "synthetic",
            "nonpersonalMetadata": True,
            "receipts": [
                {
                    "amountUnits": "10000",
                    "assetContractId": "a1",
                    "assetRef": "native-usdc",
                    "decimals": 6,
                    "id": "r1",
                    "network": "eip155:8453",
                },
            ],
        },
    )
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
4 h agoPassed402427 ms$0.012
8 h agoPassed402291 ms$0.012
13 h agoPassed402207 ms$0.012
17 h agoPassed402177 ms$0.012
21 h agoPassed402250 ms$0.012
Show 1 older checks
31 h agoPassed402188 ms$0.012