77trust / 100
Signals Btc Dominance
by apexrunner.ai in Other
x402 APIPassing, checked 41 min ago
APEX Runner: Btc Dominance Signal
GET
https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance- Price
- $0.007
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 331 ms
- 550 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 41 min ago, next any minute now
Reliability
All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked
How to call it
GET https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance
Each call costs $0.007 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
Built from the input schema. Replace the values with your own.
GET https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominanceExample response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"altcoin_bias": "reduce",
"direction": "rising",
"dominance_pct": 54.2
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.007.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.007 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.007" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.007 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapexrunner.ai%2Fsignals%2Fbtc-dominance
const res = await pay("https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.007 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.007"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://apexrunner.ai/signals/btc-dominance")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 min ago | Passed | 402 | 331 ms | $0.007 |
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 109 ms | $0.007 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 371 ms | $0.007 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 111 ms | $0.007 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 412 ms | $0.007 |
Show 10 older checks
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 325 ms | $0.007 |
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 336 ms | $0.007 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 471 ms | $0.007 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 550 ms | $0.007 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 108 ms | $0.007 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 331 ms | $0.007 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 113 ms | $0.007 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 339 ms | $0.007 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 108 ms | $0.007 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 108 ms | $0.007 |