Sla Downtime
by Systems Capacity Calculators in Other
SLA availability (99.9 percent, three nines) to allowed downtime per day, month and year; series and parallel composition.
https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 56.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 520 ms
- 796 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next in 5 h
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime?availability=99.9Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
availability | number | Yes | Availability in percent, 0 to 99.99999999 (99.9 = three nines) |
replicas | integer | No | Identical independent replicas of this component, any one of which suffices (parallel), 1 to 20 |
seriesWith | string | No | Other availabilities (percent, comma separated) of components that must ALL work, in series with this one |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 32 lines
{
"allowedDowntime": [
{
"downtime": "1 min 26.4 s",
"downtimeSeconds": 86.39999999999048,
"period": "per day"
},
{
"downtime": "10 min 4.8 s",
"downtimeSeconds": 604.7999999999333,
"period": "per week"
}
],
"asOf": "2026-10-11T20:19:40.493Z",
"availabilityPercent": 99.9,
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"nines": 3,
"notChecked": [
"how your provider measures availability (the monitored window, partial outages, excluded maintenance and the credits the SLA actually pays)",
"failure correlation: replicas in one data center share power, network and software bugs, so the parallel figure is an upper bound",
"…1 more"
],
"reasons": [
"Downtime = (1 - availability) x period; the year is 365 days and the month 30 days.",
"Series (all must work): multiply availabilities, so the chain is weaker than its weakest link. Parallel (any one suffices): multiply unavailabilities.",
"…1 more"
],
"source": "computed locally",
"summary": "99.9% (3 nines) allows 8 h 45 min 36 s per 365-day year, 43 min 12 s per 30-day month, 1 min 26.4 s per day.",
"verdict": "STANDARD_SLA"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime?availability=99.9'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime?availability=99.9' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fsla-downtime
const res = await pay("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime?availability=99.9");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/sla-downtime?availability=99.9")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 517 ms | $0.02 |
| 15 h ago | Passed | 402 | 691 ms | $0.02 |
| 47 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 110 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 102 ms | - |
| 4 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 126 ms | - |
Show 10 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 115 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 106 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 164 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 210 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 523 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 505 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 796 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 549 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 520 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 487 ms | $0.02 |