Snapshot X402 Demand
by Plainsight in Markets & finance
Plainsight's x402 market intelligence (flagship): what x402 agents actually PAY for, measured from the Bazaar's own 30-day usage — ranked by distinct buyers (not looping volume), the price split that clears (sub-$0.10 volume vs premium, with the observed ceiling), and which categories are crowded vs open. For builders and operators deciding what to list and at what price. Read from the facilitator's own usage counters.
https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand- Price
- $0.25
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 764 ms
- 972 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 13 min ago, next in 18 min
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand
Each call costs $0.25 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
Built from the input schema. Replace the values with your own.
GET https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demandExample response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 46 lines
{
"by_category": [
{
"calls_30d": 5900,
"category": "crypto-price",
"services": 120
}
],
"median_calls_30d": 3,
"opportunities": [
{
"category": "media",
"services": 12,
"signal": "established-demand",
"unique_payers_30d": 63,
"unique_payers_per_service": 5.2
}
],
"pricing": {
"median_buyer_price_usd": 0.05,
"premium_ceiling_usd": 0.3,
"premium_unique_payers": 41,
"sub_10c_unique_payers": 612
},
"services_seen": 337,
"top_buyers": [
{
"calls_30d": 144,
"category": "crypto-price",
"price_usd": 0.001,
"resource": "https://…",
"unique_payers": 56
}
],
"top_services": [
{
"calls_30d": 3985,
"category": "crypto-price",
"price_usd": 0.01,
"resource": "https://…",
"unique_payers": 3
}
],
"total_calls_30d": 7000,
"window_days": 30
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.25.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.25 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.25" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.25 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshop.netlobo.com%2Fsnapshot%2Fx402-demand
const res = await pay("https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.25 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.25"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://shop.netlobo.com/snapshot/x402-demand")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 min ago | Passed | 402 | 890 ms | $0.25 |
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 789 ms | $0.25 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 914 ms | $0.25 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 871 ms | $0.25 |
| 19 h ago | Passed | 402 | 623 ms | $0.25 |
Show 10 older checks
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.7 s | $0.25 |
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 772 ms | $0.25 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 770 ms | $0.25 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 747 ms | $0.25 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 943 ms | $0.25 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 237 ms | $0.25 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 738 ms | $0.25 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 771 ms | $0.25 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 874 ms | $0.25 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 898 ms | $0.25 |