59trust / 100

Subnet Vlsm

by Network Calc in Other

x402 APIPassing, checked 1 h ago

Split an IPv4 network into equal subnets, or allocate VLSM subnets from host counts (largest first) with ranges and leftovers.

GET
https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm
Price
$0.02
per call in USDC
Uptime
56.3%
last 30 days
Response time
510 ms
1.1 s slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
1 h ago, next in 5 h

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm

Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm?hosts=Sales%3A100%2CEng%3A50%2CLab%3A25%2CMgmt%3A10%2CWAN%3A2&network=192.168.1.0%2F24

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
hostsstringNoHost requirements, comma separated, optionally named: LAN-A:100,LAN-B:50,WAN:2
networkstringYesIPv4 CIDR to divide, for example 192.168.1.0/24
newPrefixintegerNoEqual split into subnets of this prefix length
partsintegerNoEqual split into this many subnets (a power of two, up to 1024)
pointToPointstringNotrue: give 2-host links a /31 (RFC 3021) instead of a /30

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 70 lines
{
  "addressesPerSubnet": null,
  "allocations": [
    {
      "broadcast": "192.168.1.127",
      "cidr": "192.168.1.0/25",
      "firstUsable": "192.168.1.1",
      "fitsInParent": true,
      "lastUsable": "192.168.1.126",
      "name": "Sales",
      "netmask": "255.255.255.128",
      "network": "192.168.1.0",
      "prefix": 25,
      "requestedHosts": 100,
      "totalAddresses": 128,
      "usableHosts": 126,
      "wastedAddresses": 26
    },
    {
      "broadcast": "192.168.1.191",
      "cidr": "192.168.1.128/26",
      "firstUsable": "192.168.1.129",
      "fitsInParent": true,
      "lastUsable": "192.168.1.190",
      "name": "Eng",
      "netmask": "255.255.255.192",
      "network": "192.168.1.128",
      "prefix": 26,
      "requestedHosts": 50,
      "totalAddresses": 64,
      "usableHosts": 62,
      "wastedAddresses": 12
    }
  ],
  "asOf": "2026-10-11T14:45:32.356Z",
  "degraded": false,
  "disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
  "fits": true,
  "freeBlocks": [
    {
      "addresses": 4,
      "cidr": "192.168.1.244/30"
    },
    {
      "addresses": 8,
      "cidr": "192.168.1.248/29"
    }
  ],
  "mode": "vlsm",
  "network": "192.168.1.0/24",
  "notChecked": [
    "whether the space is allocated to you or overlaps existing routes",
    "growth: each subnet is sized for exactly the hosts asked for, with no spare room",
    "…2 more"
  ],
  "reasons": [
    "Subnets are placed largest first, each aligned on its own boundary, so no space is lost to misalignment.",
    "Each subnet is the smallest power of two holding the hosts plus network and broadcast addresses (a /31 point-to-point link has no broadcast, RFC 3021)."
  ],
  "source": "RFC 4632 CIDR and RFC 3021 /31 arithmetic, computed locally",
  "subnetCount": 5,
  "subnetPrefix": null,
  "subnets": [],
  "summary": "5 subnets allocated from 192.168.1.0/24, using 244 of 256 addresses (95.31%).",
  "totalAddresses": 256,
  "usableHostsPerSubnet": null,
  "usedAddresses": 244,
  "utilizationPercent": 95.3125,
  "verdict": "ALLOCATED"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm?hosts=Sales%3A100%2CEng%3A50%2CLab%3A25%2CMgmt%3A10%2CWAN%3A2&network=192.168.1.0%2F24'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm?hosts=Sales%3A100%2CEng%3A50%2CLab%3A25%2CMgmt%3A10%2CWAN%3A2&network=192.168.1.0%2F24' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetwork-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fsubnet-vlsm
const res = await pay("https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm?hosts=Sales%3A100%2CEng%3A50%2CLab%3A25%2CMgmt%3A10%2CWAN%3A2&network=192.168.1.0%2F24");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/subnet-vlsm?hosts=Sales%3A100%2CEng%3A50%2CLab%3A25%2CMgmt%3A10%2CWAN%3A2&network=192.168.1.0%2F24")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
1 h agoPassed402571 ms$0.02
14 h agoPassed402525 ms$0.02
42 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530151 ms-
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530100 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 53053086 ms-
Show 10 older checks
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 53053091 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530111 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530206 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530168 ms-
5 days agoPassed402510 ms$0.02
5 days agoPassed402507 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed4021.1 s$0.02
6 days agoPassed402518 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402504 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402489 ms$0.02