Text Tone
by SiteCheck in Search & web
Tone analysis of a text (max 10,000 characters): formality 0-1, sentiment, emotion scores, tone labels such as friendly, aggressive or urgent, and short suggestions. The reading level (Flesch-Kincaid grade) is computed in code with a simple syllable count, so treat it as an estimate. Model judgements are not measurements.
https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone- Price
- $0.002
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 39 ms
- 39 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone
Each call costs $0.002 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone
content-type: application/json
{
"text": "Hi team, thanks for the quick reply. Could you send the report by Friday? Much appreciated."
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
text | string | Yes | Text to analyse (max 10,000 characters) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"checkedAt": "2026-10-15T18:21:18.118Z",
"emotions": {
"appreciation": 0.8,
"gratitude": 0.9
},
"formality": 0.8,
"note": "Model-based tone and sentiment; the reading level is an estimate.",
"readingLevel": {
"fleschKincaidGrade": 2.7,
"method": "Flesch-Kincaid grade, vowel-group syllable estimate, computed in code"
},
"sentiment": "positive",
"suggestions": [
"Consider adding a deadline reminder",
"Use a more direct tone for urgent requests",
"Be mindful of the team's workload"
],
"tones": [
"friendly",
"polite"
]
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.002.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"text":"Hi team, thanks for the quick reply. Could you send the report by Friday? Much appreciated."}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"text":"Hi team, thanks for the quick reply. Could you send the report by Friday? Much appreciated."}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.002 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.002" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.002 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.sitecheck-api.workers.dev%2Fapi%2Ftext%2Ftone&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"text": "Hi team, thanks for the quick reply. Could you send the report by Friday? Much appreciated."
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.002 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.002"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://api.sitecheck-api.workers.dev/api/text/tone",
json={
"text": "Hi team, thanks for the quick reply. Could you send the report by Friday? Much appreciated.",
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 39 ms | $0.002 |