Token
by presign-guard in Onchain & crypto
Is this token safe to buy, or a honeypot or rug pull? Checks a Solana or EVM token before you buy, hold or accept it (mint or freeze authority still active, LP not locked, buy/sell tax, low liquidity, brand-new token, concentrated holders) and answers green/orange/red with a grade (SAFE/CAUTION/RISKY/AVOID), the reasons, a one-line summary and market data. Bulk: 100 checks for $0.80 via /v1/credits.
https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 0.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- -
- no timed checks yet
- Last check
- Failed
- 1 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 1 h ago: Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token?address=DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263&chain=solanaParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | Yes | Solana mint address (base58), EVM token contract (0x...), an XRPL token as CURRENCY.rIssuer (e.g. RLUSD.rMxCKbEDwqr76QuheSUMdEGf4B9xJ8m5De), or an Algorand asset id (e.g. 31566704) |
chain | string | Yes | Chain the token lives on One of: solana, base, ethereum, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, bsc, xrpl, algorand. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 30 lines
{
"grade": "SAFE",
"market": {
"ageSeconds": 98000000,
"liquidityUsd": 422000,
"marketCapUsd": 1000000000,
"priceUsd": 0.0000123,
"url": "https://dexscreener.com/solana/...",
"volume24hUsd": 350000
},
"one_liner": "SAFE: no red flags, $422k liquidity, 3.1 years old",
"reasons": [
{
"code": "MUTABLE_METADATA",
"severity": "info"
}
],
"sources": [
"goplus",
"dexscreener",
"rugcheck"
],
"token": {
"address": "DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263",
"chain": "solana",
"name": "Bonk",
"symbol": "Bonk"
},
"verdict": "green"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token?address=DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263&chain=solana'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token?address=DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263&chain=solana' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpresign-guard.fizzl.eu%2Fv1%2Ftoken
const res = await pay("https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token?address=DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263&chain=solana");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token?address=DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263&chain=solana")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 902 ms | $0.01 |
| 5 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 358 ms | $0.01 |
| 11 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 266 ms | $0.01 |
| 16 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 303 ms | $0.01 |
| 22 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 277 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 28 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 231 ms | $0.01 |
| 34 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 805 ms | $0.01 |
| 40 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 402 ms | $0.01 |
| 45 h ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 229 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 399 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 284 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 428 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 295 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 287 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.01" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 390 ms | $0.01 |