33trust / 100

Token Check

by Base Token Risk Check in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIFailing, checked 26 h ago

Pay-per-call token risk check for Base: send a Base ERC-20 contract address, get deterministic JSON risk flags (owner/renounced, upgradeable proxy, mint/pause/blacklist/fee functions, on-chain Uniswap v2/v3 + Aerodrome liquidity, holder concentration) and a rule-based risk_level. Use before buying or listing an unfamiliar Base token. $0.01 USDC. Invalid input returns 400 and is not charged. Not financial advice.

POST
https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check
Price
$0.01
per call in USDC
Uptime
54.8%
last 30 days
Response time
651 ms
1.0 s slowest 5%
Last check
Failed
26 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Latest check failed 26 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

POST https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check

Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

POST https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check
content-type: application/json

{
  "token": "0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4"
}

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
tokenstringYesBase (chain 8453) ERC-20 token contract address

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 29 lines
{
  "chain": "base",
  "chain_id": 8453,
  "contract": {
    "is_contract": true,
    "is_eip1967_proxy": false,
    "owner_renounced": true
  },
  "disclaimer": "Informational on-chain data only. Not financial, investment, legal or tax advice. Heuristic flags can be wrong; do your own research.",
  "flags": [],
  "holders": {
    "holders_count": 948126,
    "top10_share_ex_pools_burn": 0.318,
    "top1_share_ex_pools_burn": 0.1166
  },
  "liquidity": {
    "best_estimate_usd": 2618438.83,
    "onchain_approx_liquidity_usd": 1779451.93
  },
  "risk_level": "low",
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "status": "ok",
  "token": "0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4",
  "token_info": {
    "decimals": 18,
    "name": "Brett",
    "symbol": "BRETT"
  }
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"token":"0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4"}'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"token":"0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4"}' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.x402risk.com%2Fv1%2Ftoken-check&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    "token": "0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4"
  }),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.post(
        "https://api.x402risk.com/v1/token-check",
        json={
            "token": "0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4",
        },
    )
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
26 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530184 ms-
36 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530178 ms-
47 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530167 ms-
2 days agoPassed402694 ms$0.01
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530186 ms-
Show 10 older checks
3 days agoPassed402651 ms$0.01
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530251 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530168 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530161 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 5025022.4 s-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530169 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 502502727 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530239 ms-
5 days agoPassed402557 ms$0.01
5 days agoPassed402341 ms$0.01