Token Risk
by AgentFeed in Onchain & crypto
Solana token rug check / risk signals for any SPL mint: mint and freeze authority status (revoked is safer), top-1 and top-10 holder concentration, supply, and a list of risk flags. Use when you need to answer: Is this SPL token a rug? Not a honeypot or LP-lock checker.
https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint- Price
- $0.005
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 196 ms
- 292 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 5 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint
Each call costs $0.005 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mintExample response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 37 lines
{
"data": {
"authorities": {
"freeze_authority": null,
"mint_authority": null
},
"concentration": {
"note": "token accounts, not unique owners — pools/exchanges may be included",
"top10_pct": 38.42,
"top1_pct": 8.83,
"top_accounts": [
{
"address": "5hpfC9VBxVcoW9opCnM2PqR6YWRLBzrBpabJTZnwwNiw",
"amount": 7770515063166.431
},
{
"address": "2vPvEovB1gw8bAUqasThEv6YMAdJ77AU3RxiUNqknEiw",
"amount": 5972593511837.953
},
{
"address": "6LozHQrLbEPeJGWKpN6wnnk76GhD4bGAVSoTBE5xXpsf",
"amount": 3190931235000.8315
}
]
},
"mint": "DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263",
"name": "Bonk",
"program": "spl-token",
"risk_flag_count": 0,
"risk_flags": [],
"source": "Solana RPC: the mint account, its metadata account and getTokenLargestAccounts",
"supply": 87994359450649.19,
"symbol": "Bonk"
},
"paid": true,
"tool": "get_token_risk"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.005.
The code pays $0.005 in USDC on Base instead: it uses a payment scheme other than exact, which needs a different client setup.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.005 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.005" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.005 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx402.ochinimus.app%2Fapi%2Ftoken-risk%2F%3Amint
const res = await pay("https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.005 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.005"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://x402.ochinimus.app/api/token-risk/:mint")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 206 ms | $0.005 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 206 ms | $0.005 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 230 ms | $0.005 |
| 19 h ago | Passed | 402 | 237 ms | $0.005 |
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 211 ms | $0.005 |
Show 10 older checks
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 170 ms | $0.005 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 184 ms | $0.005 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 198 ms | $0.005 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 165 ms | $0.005 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 217 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 200 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 171 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 155 ms | $0.005 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 205 ms | $0.005 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 275 ms | $0.005 |
History
| 12 Oct 2026 | Price changed from $0.01 to $0.005 |