ToolVet
80trust / 100

Token Verdict

by Citiview Agent Market in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIPassing, checked 12 min ago

Quick AI token verdict: a 2-3 sentence plain-English risk summary plus risk level and red flags for any token on Base, Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism or Solana. Built on honeypot sell simulation and tax checks (EVM) or mint/freeze authority and holder concentration (Solana). Half the price of the full report.

GET
https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict
Price
$0.005
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
71 ms
1.5 s slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
12 min ago, next in 18 min

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

GET https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict

Each call costs $0.005 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict?address=0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631&chain=base

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
addressstringYes0x token contract or Solana mint
chainstringNobase (default for 0x) | ethereum | polygon | arbitrum | optimism | solana (auto for mints)

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "chain": "base",
  "flags": [],
  "name": "Aerodrome",
  "risk": "low",
  "symbol": "AERO",
  "verdict": "Aerodrome shows no red flags: the source is verified, there is no buy or sell tax and it sells normally. Overall risk: low."
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.005.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict?address=0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631&chain=base'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict?address=0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631&chain=base' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.005 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.005" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.005 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fagents.citiviewgroup.com%2Fv1%2Ftoken%2Fverdict
const res = await pay("https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict?address=0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631&chain=base");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.005 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.005"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://agents.citiviewgroup.com/v1/token/verdict?address=0x940181a94A35A4569E4529A3CDfB74e38FD98631&chain=base")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
12 min agoPassed4021.5 s$0.005
4 h agoPassed40271 ms$0.005
9 h agoPassed402126 ms$0.005
13 h agoPassed40293 ms$0.005
17 h agoPassed40255 ms$0.005
Show 7 older checks
21 h agoPassed402143 ms$0.005
26 h agoPassed40249 ms$0.005
30 h agoPassed40246 ms$0.005
34 h agoPassed40280 ms$0.005
38 h agoPassed40246 ms$0.005
42 h agoPassed402219 ms$0.005
46 h agoPassed40243 ms$0.005