Trace
by adctx in Onchain & crypto
Where did this address's money come from, and would it have arrived if the address had not sent it first? Give any Base address, get a live read: distinct payers, how many of them this address funded inside the window, the USDC left once those are removed, and how many funded wallets sent back the exact amount they were given, and how fast. One seller in our weekly reading took in 339.20 USDC, and 338.70 of it was its own money coming back.
https://t.adctx.com/trace- Price
- $0.1
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 250 ms
- 319 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 3 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://t.adctx.com/trace
Each call costs $0.1 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://t.adctx.com/trace?address=0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905&hours=24Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | Yes | any Base address, not only a seller |
hours | string | No | window length ending at the chain tip, 24 by default and 168 at most |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"address": "0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905",
"arms_length_usdc": "0.5",
"inbound_usdc": "339.2",
"ok": true,
"payers": "55",
"round_trip": {
"exact_returns": "49",
"median_block_gap": "18"
},
"self_funded_payers": "51",
"verdict": "paid",
"window": {
"hours": "168.0"
}
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.1.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://t.adctx.com/trace?address=0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905&hours=24'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://t.adctx.com/trace?address=0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905&hours=24' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.1 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.1" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.1 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Ft.adctx.com%2Ftrace
const res = await pay("https://t.adctx.com/trace?address=0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905&hours=24");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.1 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.1"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://t.adctx.com/trace?address=0x17cd53c04d707ef0dd615ef56c633f02915a7905&hours=24")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Passed | 402 | 214 ms | $0.1 |
| 8 h ago | Passed | 402 | 344 ms | $0.1 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 255 ms | $0.1 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 232 ms | $0.1 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 267 ms | $0.1 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 234 ms | $0.1 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 250 ms | $0.1 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 203 ms | $0.1 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 253 ms | $0.1 |
| 43 h ago | Passed | 402 | 278 ms | $0.1 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 242 ms | $0.1 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 222 ms | $0.1 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 265 ms | $0.1 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 277 ms | $0.1 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 226 ms | $0.1 |