Vendor Comparison Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

721 ms typical, 1.2 s slowest 5%

Last check

3 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/vendor_comparison/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Compare supplied vendor proposals against explicit requirements, cost components, risks, and unanswered questions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fvendor_comparison%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/vendor_comparison/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Compare supplied vendor proposals against explicit requirements, cost components, risks, and unanswered questions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Compare supplied vendor proposals against explicit requirements, cost components, risks, and unanswered questions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Vendor Proposal Comparison for Example Door Company Scheduling Improvement Project\n\n### Explicit Requirements\n- Improve scheduling over six weeks\n- Use two-person crew\n- Weekday consultations\n- Evaluation criteria: implementation effort, scope clarity, staff training\n\n### Vendor Proposals\n| Vendor | Proposal Description                | Cost  | Scope Clarity           | Implementation Effort | Staff Training Included |\n|--------|----------------------------------|-------|---------------------",
  "assumptions": [
    "Implementation effort for Vendor A is lower due to assessment-only scope.",
    "Implementation effort for Vendor B is higher due to added workshop component."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume and scheduling performance metrics.",
    "Customer feedback on existing scheduling process."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:23.626Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_vendor_comparison",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "Vendor A proposes a $500 process assessment only, with limited scope and no staff training, implying lower implementation effort. Vendor B proposes a $800 assessment plus staff workshop, offering broa",
  "task": "vendor_comparison"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks