Wallet Screen Json
by LION Verified Company in Onchain & crypto
Is this crypto wallet sanctioned? Instant OFAC SDN address screen for AI agents. Returns PASS/WARN/BLOCK. $0.001 Base USDC, keyless x402. Ed25519-attested. Upsell: full counterparty bundle $0.05.
https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json- Price
- $0.001
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 532 ms
- 914 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
How to call it
GET https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json
Each call costs $0.001 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json?address=0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | Yes | Crypto wallet address to OFAC SDN screen (EVM 0x…) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"asset_id": "LION_WALLET_SCREEN_001",
"ofac": {
"hit": false,
"list": "US Treasury OFAC SDN"
},
"resolved": true,
"score": 100,
"upsell": {
"compliance_bundle": {
"price_usdc": "0.05"
},
"verified_company_file": {
"price_usdc": "0.95"
}
},
"verdict": "PASS"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.001.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json?address=0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json?address=0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.001 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.001" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.001 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Flion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev%2Fapi%2Fx402%2Fwallet-screen-json
const res = await pay("https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json?address=0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.001 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.001"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://lion-x402-bible.lionmaster-operations.workers.dev/api/x402/wallet-screen-json?address=0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 572 ms | $0.001 |
| 8 h ago | Passed | 402 | 929 ms | $0.001 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 508 ms | $0.001 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.0 s | $0.001 |
| 20 h ago | Passed | 402 | 530 ms | $0.001 |
Show 10 older checks
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 425 ms | $0.001 |
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 815 ms | $0.001 |
| 32 h ago | Passed | 402 | 549 ms | $0.001 |
| 36 h ago | Passed | 402 | 829 ms | $0.001 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 617 ms | $0.001 |
| 43 h ago | Passed | 402 | 472 ms | $0.001 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 432 ms | $0.001 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 476 ms | $0.001 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 517 ms | $0.001 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 541 ms | $0.001 |