ToolVet
75trust / 100

Web Extract Fields

by api.manylives.me in Search & web

x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago

Read a public web page and return just the fields you name as JSON (e.g. price, author, date, address). Missing fields come back null; values are taken from the page, never invented. Respects robots.txt.

GET
https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields
Price
$0.015
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
486 ms
534 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
4 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

GET https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields

Each call costs $0.015 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields?fields=title%2Cpurpose%2Ccontact&url=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
fieldsstringYescomma-separated field names (required), e.g. title,price,author
urlstringYeshttps://... public page (required)

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "fields": [
    {
      "name": "title",
      "value": "Example Domain"
    },
    {
      "name": "price",
      "value": null
    }
  ],
  "url": "https://example.com/"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.015.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields?fields=title%2Cpurpose%2Ccontact&url=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields?fields=title%2Cpurpose%2Ccontact&url=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.015 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.015" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.015 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.manylives.me%2Fpaid%2Fweb%2Fextract-fields
const res = await pay("https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields?fields=title%2Cpurpose%2Ccontact&url=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.015 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.015"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://api.manylives.me/paid/web/extract-fields?fields=title%2Cpurpose%2Ccontact&url=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
4 h agoPassed402434 ms$0.015
8 h agoPassed402497 ms$0.015
12 h agoPassed402519 ms$0.015
16 h agoPassed402597 ms$0.015
20 h agoPassed402699 ms$0.015
Show 10 older checks
24 h agoPassed402525 ms$0.015
28 h agoPassed402358 ms$0.015
32 h agoPassed402461 ms$0.015
35 h agoPassed402486 ms$0.015
39 h agoPassed402501 ms$0.015
43 h agoPassed402491 ms$0.015
47 h agoPassed402534 ms$0.015
2 days agoPassed402494 ms$0.015
2 days agoPassed402506 ms$0.015
2 days agoPassed402486 ms$0.015